THAT'S IT! I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!
How do you HONESTLY believe that Terri WANTED to be dehydrated and starved to death? I really WANT TO KNOW! Because MICHAEL said so? Do your homework! Michael has LIED on the stand. Lied in the media. Hid a bone scan showing that Terri had 13 bone fractures and a "history of trauma" (scan was done in 1991, but the Schindlers never knew about it until 2002). Never asked question one about HOW Terri (the woman he loves so dearly) got 13 bone fractures! NO INVESTIGATION for Mr Malpractice Suit?! Never even MENTIONED it to the Schindlers, even though he was LIVING with them at the time! Never even asked, "Hey did you ever see any of the doctors or nurses drop Terri?" I would say that warrants a removal as guardian at the VERY LEAST!
Michael went shopping funeral homes and burial plots once he learned Terri had a urinary tract infection(see thread below for interviews with Bobby Schindler). Yes, back when he ordered them NOT to treat her for the infection. The same kind of infection that took the life of the Pope. Yes, untreated it can lead to death. KNOWING this, Michael ordered that Terri NOT be given the antibiotics needed to treat it. He not only admits it under oath, but goes on to explain that he was informed this was against the law to refuse her the antibiotics. He should have been removed as her guardian RIGHT THEN AND THERE! He also admits that because it was against the law was the ONLY reason he allowed them to treat her for it.
Michael wanted to become a nurse to CARE for Terri. Well, going to school for nursing- he should have been the FIRST ONE DEMANDING THAT TERRI get range of motion therapy! GOOD GRIEF! Even if you think she will never come out of it, YOU DON'T DENY RANGE OF MOTION! THAT IS BEYOND CRUEL!!!!! STRIKE THREE- NO WAY THIS MAN SHOULD BE GUARDIAN OF A DOG, LET ALONE A HANDICAPPED WOMAN!
Oh, that's right, Michaels brother and sister-in-law also said they remembered Terri didn't want to be on "artificial life support." Hmmmm, funny no, no they did not. At least not at first. But then neither did Michael say it at first. Michael waited until he was engaged to remember she didn't want to live this way. If you do your homework, you will find that the GAL (guardian ad litem) assigned to Terri back in 1998 found that Michael had a few conflicts of interest and was not reliable as to Terri's wishes. The GAL, Pearson, was alarmed by Michael's benefits of Terri's death, his new fiance, and the chronology of his "memory" of what Terri's "wishes" were. Once Pearson submitted his report- - IN WRITING-Felos immediatly filed for Pearson to be dismissed because he was "biased." HUH? Of course, Greer not only dismissed Pearson, but then assigned HIMSELF as GAL for Terri. This is AGAINST Florida Canons. Even better, it was after this report that more people with the last name Schiavo suddenly had miraculous memories of how Terri "wanted" to die.
Terri was shoved into a HOSPICE when she was NOT terminal- and Michael's attorney JUST HAPPENED TO BE ON THE BOARD!
AND US EEEVIL PRO-LIFERS ARE THE ONES MAKING UP CONSPIRACY?
WE ARE THE ONES WITH ILL INTENT?
WE ARE THE ONES PUSHING OUR WILL ONTO OTHERS???
TAKE A CLOSER LOOK! IT IS MICHAEL WHO PUSHED HIS WILL ON TERRI!
WE ARE THE WACKED OUT RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS? HAVE YOU READ FELOS' BOOK?FELOS AND GREER WERE TOO HAPPY TO HELP!
THEY ALL HAVE DIFFERENT REASONS; BUT TO THEM, IT WAS NEVER ABOUT WHAT TERRI WANTED!
SADLY ENOUGH, TO MOST OF AMERICA IT WAS NEVER ABOUT WHAT TERRI WANTED. IT WAS USUALLY ABOUT HOW THEY WOULDN'T WANT TO LIVE THAT WAY, POLITICS, MEDIA, OR A POWER STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE 3 BRANCHES OF GOV'T.
SOMEHOW, TERRI GOT LOST IN THIS WHOLE THING. LITERALLY, TERRI GOT LOST.
AMERICA ONCE SAID, "GIVE US YOUR TIRED, YOUR POOR, YOUR HUDDLED MASSES." AMERICA NOW SAYS, GIVE US THE LAWBREAKERS SNEAKING ACROSS THE BORDER, WE'LL PROTECT THEM, WE'LL FIGHT FOR THEM, BUT DON'T GIVE US YOUR HANDICAPPED.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH GAVE A LECTURE TO CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT? THIS WAS THE SADDEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN IN AMERICA, SHORT OF 9/11. THEY CITE WHAT OUR FOREFATHERS WANTED? AS EARLY AS 1801, THOMAS JEFFERSON WARNED US AGAINST THE RULE OF FEW BY THE JUDICIARY. IF THERE IS ONE THING I KNOW FOR CERTAIN- OUR FOREFATHERS WOULD HAVE STARTED A MOVEMENT AGAINST A GOV'T THAT DID WHAT THEY DID TO TERRI, AND IT WOULD NOT HAVE STARTED WITH A TEA PARTY.