Straight Up with Sherri

Friday, March 25, 2005

SAVE TERRI NOW!!! THIS CAN WORK!! PLAN OF ACTION!!!

Plan of action..

According to news reports, Attorney Gibbs has filed a motion today with Judge Greer on testimony about Terri's attempt to communicate last Friday (March 18, 2005) that she wants to live.

Judge Greer asked why it took so long for this claim to come before him....(I will refrain from the obvious answer here.)

There are several media accounts of this information that was made available ON THAT SAME DAY!

I have chatted with other bloggers--- this is the plan....

The fact that Terri tried to say "I want to live," LAST Friday is documented in several places....

We need to FLOOD the Media with links to these stories. This will get the information FLOODING! If you are a blogger-- BLOG IT! EVERYONE EMAIL THE LINKS! This will back-up the filing of Attorney Gibbs that THIS DID HAPPEN!

Once this info is out to back-up Gibbs, they cannot claim that it was made up today!!!

Here are some of the links:

http://www.theempirejournal.com/0319054_terri_schiavo_says_she_w.htm

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43383

http://straightupwsherri.blogspot.com/2005/03/terri-speaks.html#comments


EMAIL EVERY MEDIA OUTLET YOU CAN!!!

I will be updating with those email addresses to make it easier!!!


mailto:drudge@drudgereport.com

news@worldnetdaily.com
Send a letter to the editor:

letters@worldnetdaily.com


Hannity & ColmesSean Hannity
Hannity@foxnews.com

Hannity & ColmesAlan Colmes
Colmes@foxnews.com


me@glennbeck.com

jeb.bush@myflorida.com


More will be coming!!!

GOT MAIL??

Rush@EIBNet.com, kherman@statesman.com, 19Latest@daily.misleader.org, greenpartyusa@igc.org, pjnyden@wvgazette.com, ellengoodman@globe.com, shadowland@newsweek.com, news@reedbusiness.com, MyWord@FoxNews.com, REvans@mercurynews.com, JHubner@Mercurynews.com, prez@usa-exile.org, Malibunews@malibutimes.com, Margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com, FNS@FoxNews.com, Beltway@FoxNews.com, Hannity@FoxNews.com, Colmes@FoxNews.com, alan@alan.com, jim.mills@foxnews.com, Newswatch@FoxNews.com, Oreilly@FoxNews.com, Special@Foxnews.com, latenight@nbc.com, tdp@nt.net, Newswatch@foxnews.com, letters@nypost.com, Moneyline@CNN.com, cushman@nytimes.com, abramsreport@msnbc.com, Hardball@MSNBC.com, evening@cbsnews.com, weekends@cbsnews.com, Questions@MSNBC.com, Joe@msnbc.com, Imus@MSNBC.com, Question@msnbc.com, Nightly@NBC.com, MTP@NBC.com, Crossfire@cnn.com, Wolf@CNN.com, CapReport@cnbc.com, Reliable@cnn.com, newsroom@bergen.com, Jeff.newsstand@cnn.com, Rwallace@herald.com, Arobinson@herald.com, babingtonc@washpost.com, newhnews@ncia.net, Letters@prospect.org, letters@cmonitor.com, inquirer.letters@phillynews.com, letters@detnews.com, senator@akaka.senate.gov, senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov, info@kenblackwell.com, talk2bob@mail.house.gov, kit_bond@bond.senate.gov, rep.brady@mail.house.gov, jim_bunning@bunning.senate.gov, senator_byrd@byrd.senate.gov, senator@cochran.senate.gov, senator@collins.senate.gov, senator@conrad.senate.gov, john.conyers@mail.house.gov, tom.davis@mail.house.gov, senator@dorgan.senate.gov, roger.schultz@halliburton.com, senator_domenici@domenici.senate.gov, russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov, mailbox@gregg.senate.gov, texas.granger@mail.house.gov, chuck_hagel@hagel.senate.gov, Tom_Harkin@harkin.senate.gov, senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov, Rep.Hinojosa@mail.house.gov, vermont@jeffords.senate.gov, rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov, tim@johnson.senate.gov, info@kyl.senate.gov, Senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov, Petes@mail.house.gov, lloyd.doggett@mail.house.gov, senatorlott@lott.senate.gov, Nita.lowey@mail.house.gov, senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov, john_mccain@mccain.senate.gov, senator@mikulski.senate.gov, senator_murray@murray.senate.gov, rep.paul@mail.house.gov, senator@pryor.senate.gov, Senator@rockefeller.senate.gov, senator@shelby.senate.gov, olympia@snowe.senate.gov, senator@stabenow.senate.gov, mailbox@sununu.senate.gov, senator_talent@talent.senate.gov, senator_voinovich@voinovich.senate.gov, senator@warner.senate.gov, dheidt@citynet.net, DYJackson@tribune.com, SKuczka@tribune.com, pbriant@globeandmail.ca, ddefenoyl@globeandmail.ca, op-ed@latimes.com, weblog@guardianunlimited.co.uk, features@independent.co.uk, valley@latimes.com, business@latimes.com, ventura@latimes.com, metrodesk@latimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, the-arts@nytimes.com, bizday@nytimes.com, metro@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com, online.editor@thetimes.co.uk, rcribb@thestar.ca, foreign.news@thetimes.co.uk, dbrazao@thestar.ca, ldiebel@thestar.ca, 2020@abc.com, thisweek@abc.com, nightline@abcnews.com , mike@mikemalloy.com, rrhodes@airamericaradio.com, info@alternativeradio.org , info@alternet.org, talk2us@americasblackforum.com, feedback@ap.org, msilverman@ap.org, rfournier@ap.org, hunt@ap.org, bsenftleber@ajc.com, bsteiden@ajc.com, hklibanoff@ajc.com, rnarayanan@ajc.com, atrios@comcast.net, newsonline@bbc.co.uk, anita@mindgallery.com, jfetzer@d.umn.edu, hprzybyla@bloomberg.net, hrosenkrantz@bloomberg.net, ombud@globe.com, kcooper@globe.com, oliphant@globe.com, brelis@globe.com, lettersbwol@businessweek.com, richard_dunham@businessweek.com, buzzflash@buzzflash.com, query@cambridgeforum.org, 48hours@cbsnews.com, 60m@cbsnews.com, bpc@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com, sundays@cbsnews.com, grain@cbsnews.com, aweathersbee@suntimes.com, cledbetter@suntimes.com, showcase@suntimes.com, jcruickshank@suntimes.com, sneed@suntimes.com, ddouglas@suntimes.com, rkemper@tribune.com, cgarrett@tribune.com, GWashburn@tribune.com, jzeleny@tribune.com, MPossley@tribune.com, jcrewdson@tribune.com, bmccauley@enquirer.com, dhorn@enquirer.com, jborgman@enquirer.com, jloven@ap.org, kcarroll@ap.org, npickler@ap.org, sjohnson@ap.org, cwarmbold@ajc.com, wilsonc@timesrecordnews.com


BIG LIST, I KNOW! THIS MAY LOOK INTIMIDATING, BUT WITH ALL OF US WORKING, THIS COULD WORK!!!!



90 Comments:

  • You're inferring that Greer asked "why now" because Greer may think it was "made up" today. The question was really about why submit this as evidence now, as opposed to any/all of the hearings all week long. In other words, if Gibbs felt it was credible evidence, why submit it only today.

    Also, don't forget this was widely publicized by both Drudge and the FRC last week. But may be worth a shot.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:17 PM  

  • Let me state it a better way. If Greer doesn't' act on this, it won't be because he doesn't believe the sworn affidavit (by an officer of the court, no less).

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:19 PM  

  • As much as I don't care for Greer, it is a valid question, but as GIbbs has said, he DEPENDED on the NEW LAW to get Terri SAFE and THEN HE WOULD HAVE THIS INFO AND PLENTY MORE TO PRESENT!

    IN THIS PARITCULAR SITUATION-- THEY BOTH HAVE VALID POINTS!!!

    BUT LET'S JUST DO WHAT WE CAN...

    Can anyone else think of anything better we can do with our time at the moment??

    I ask sincerely-- not being smart.... this is just the best plan I think of that involves action..along with prayer, of course....

    By Blogger Straight Up with Sherri, at 10:21 PM  

  • If Greer is having fits over 5 days, how does he feel about scumbag adulterer husband waiting 7 years for his 'revelation'?
    Marine Momma..you know, maybe if we sent in the Marines this would all be over with :)

    By Anonymous Marine Momma, at 10:29 PM  

  • Sherri -- I have tried and failed to get a post to the prior thread to anonymous at 9:37 (why can't you use a name?) Here it is now. You say that MIchael did not leave Terri for another woman. He has another woman and two children.

    Yet he still claims the right to snuff Terri. I, and everybody who fell off the turnip truck at least 25 feet ago, say he has left.

    When you are a few feet further from the turnip truck, you will say the same.

    If only he would admit the same.

    Sigh.

    By Blogger levi from queens, at 10:36 PM  

  • I'd imagine the bigger blunder is why this wasn't presented to Whittemore at the federal level, which was authorized by Congress to consider new evidence. That opportunity is gone now (I don't think it can be raised as a new item in any further federal appeals).

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:37 PM  

  • levi

    I have no idea why you can't get the post on the other thread..

    Blogger can be VERY tentramental at times!

    if they are a worthy opponenet they will return, but my guess is that they are not worthy of you!!

    did you get my email???

    I sent it to the email addy on your business card...

    By Blogger Straight Up with Sherri, at 10:44 PM  

  • Sherri,
    I took the liberty of posting this on BFT. In your previous thread, Sarah D. left a comment that Greer had ordered an IV while he was considering this latest piece of evidence. Can you confirm this? I don't want to get my hopes up for nothing (again).

    By Blogger Beautiful Belgian Babe, at 10:45 PM  

  • Anonymous,

    I didn't know vegetables could make noise!

    By Anonymous Sarah D., at 10:51 PM  

  • bbb

    NO! He did not order her to get an IV...

    Gibbs requested it, but was denied, Greer said that he will consider ALL that GIbbs has asked him to by noon tomorrow.. Maybe sooner, no promises....

    To the best of my recollection--

    But definately no on the IV at this MOMENT!!

    By Blogger Straight Up with Sherri, at 10:55 PM  

  • The trolls are out in full force today! Maybe something good's happening.

    By Blogger Beautiful Belgian Babe, at 10:55 PM  

  • Too bad about no IV. That would be so out of character for Greer, wouldn't it? I hope him waiting until noon tomorrow means he's actually thinking about the evidence.

    By Blogger Beautiful Belgian Babe, at 10:57 PM  

  • The one who needs to get these is Greer, but he doesn't have an accessible email that I can find. That's the thing about the courts. They obviously now can make life and death decisions and can thumb their nose at the executive and legislative branches, and we can't even send them an email to express our opinion. Nice to be ruled by the unaccountable Black Robed inquisition. And we are not killing innocent Iraqi Citizens. We are helping them, just like we are trying here to help Terri. Very consistent.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:59 PM  

  • we can't even send them an email to express our opinion

    Judges are supposed to rule on facts, not opinions. But I think Sherri's point is the Weller visit is a fact. If Gibbs and the affidavit didn't already make that clear, they are very remiss indeed. The Weller visit should not be in question.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:05 PM  

  • Refresh my memory: Has Greer stated a deadline for a ruling previous to this one? I know that once he said that he wouldn't give a deadline.

    Anyone?

    By Anonymous Sarah D., at 11:06 PM  

  • Just to be clear, he didn't give a deadline per se for this ruling.

    He said he would try to get the ruling out "as early as I can. I can't promise when, um, but certainly no later than noon tomorrow, I don't think".

    Gibbs then re-asked the question about minimal hydration until the ruling tomorrow.

    Greer responded "I'm not saying tomorrow. It could be as early as tomorrow. I'll consider everything you requested, sir".

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:13 PM  

  • The affidavits were "executed" on Tuesday the 22nd, according to the transcripts on BFT. I don't get that.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:25 PM  

  • This is real easy to do! Highlight the entire email list starting from rush down to the last. Cut and paste it in one email. Ask them to help Terri with this info. It may take awhile for the email to go through, but it's real easy!
    Thanks Sherri for doing this!
    Marine Momma

    By Anonymous Marine Momma, at 11:27 PM  

  • You have to remember that since the BEGINNING, the Shindlers have been saying Terri is not PVS, and she is trying to communicate. Behavior like this is nothing new to the family, but every time they've brought it to court that judge has blown off their claims and any of the witnesses who backed them up. I can understand why the attorneys put their attentions to something else. But better late than never if this is what saves Terri.

    By Anonymous FloridaHeat, at 11:35 PM  

  • Morons, the lot of you. HA HA HA

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:39 PM  

  • Do you really believe that after 15 years she said i line then back to her state that she is in? come on sherri you are smarter then that!

    By Anonymous ylb, at 11:40 PM  

  • Levi From Queens:

    I asked you a question in that post.

    WHY DID TERRI SCHIAVO'S PARENTS ENCOURAGE MICHAEL SCHIAVO TO DATE .. WHILE HE WAS LIVING IN THEIR HOME ... WHILE HE WAS TAKING CARE OF TERRI .. AND WHY DID THEY ASK HIM TO BRING THOSE DATES HOME TO MEET THEM?

    He did not leave her ... was he never supposed to move on with his life after they know so many years later that she would NEVER recover (and obviously never has)???

    He was ENCOURAGED to move on with his live by the Schindlers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:42 PM  

  • You have got to be kidding me.

    Seriously.

    The fact that any of you even think .. that this is real .. makes me incredibly sad for you.

    If this woman has not spoken in 15 years ... you're actually going to believe ... HONESTLY believe .. that 1 week ago she spoke a sentence??????????

    Do you not think for one second .. that this is a PLOY ... so they would have a reason to get the feeding to re-inserted .. and then they'd have to go through this whole process AGAIN and stall for another 2 or three years????

    And explain again WHY .. the day they filed the first appeal ... that they didn't bring up this MOST CRUCIAL ALLEGED INCIDENT?????

    Why?

    Because it's a lie.

    I cannot believe ... the depths to which people are going ... in this matter.

    The Schindlers did say they would stop at nothing ... and that even if they had ever heard it out of Terri's mouth that she didn't want to be kept alive by artificial means, they would ignore it because they like visiting her.

    This is a travesty beyond proportions.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:47 PM  

  • And I cannot believe the excitement some people have about this woman's death.

    By Blogger Beautiful Belgian Babe, at 11:50 PM  

  • By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:51 PM  

  • Seems a lot of people getting worked up over the "crisis" of the week. Geesh... this is sickening.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:54 PM  

  • You have to remember that since the BEGINNING, the Shindlers have been saying Terri is not PVS.

    This is a false statement. Not true. STOP SPREADING LIES!!!!

    http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/WolfsonReport.pdf

    Within the testimony, as part of the hypotheticals presented, Schindler family members stated that even if Theresa had told them of her intention to have artificial nutrition withdrawn, they would not do it. Throughout this painful and difficult trial, the family acknowledged
    that Theresa was in a persistent vegetative state.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:56 PM  

  • I want to share something. About the same time Terri fell disabled, another woman did too. A family that lived in my area had 5 little ones and were on the way from Toledo to Florida. Soon after they left Toledo they got into a car accident. No one was killed, but the mom, Mary Ann, was injured and has been in the same state that Terri is in. To make a long story short, her husband did care for her and she does get therapy, but he has moved on. He ended up divorcing her and giving guardianship over to a relative of hers. He has since remarried. This is the point here, if Michael so badly wanted to be rid of her, then he should have divorced her. Because he is pushing so hard to have her killed has to show that there is more involved.
    Marine Momma

    By Anonymous Marine Momma, at 11:57 PM  

  • After 15 years in vegetative state and not communicating, Terri suddenly screams out...

    AAAAAAWWWW WHAAAAAAA

    MY GOD, IT'S A HOLY MIRACLE!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:58 PM  

  • Yeah, FloridaHeat, I'm surprised you made that claim, too. The Schindlers agreed with the PVS asseessment until their falling out with Michael (after the malpractice settlement).

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:01 AM  

  • http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7293186/

    ATLANTA - A three-judge federal appeals court panel Friday night rejected a request by Terri Schiavo’s parents to have their daughter’s feeding tube reinserted.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:02 AM  

  • She's alive!

    Evidence here

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:04 AM  

  • Marine Mammal:

    This is the point here, if Michael so badly wanted to be rid of her, then he should have divorced her. Because he is pushing so hard to have her killed has to show that there is more involved.

    NO THE POINT HERE IS THAT Michael Schiavo loves Terri enough to make sure HER WISHES are carried out. The Schindlers have testified that they would not carry out her wishes EVEN IF she had told them herself.

    IF HE DIDN'T CARE ABOUT HER .. he would have divorced her a long time ago ... and let the Schindlers do whatever they wanted with her.

    STOP MAKING YOUR LIES UP!!!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:05 AM  

  • uh=oh, satans little minions are back, the Lord rebuke you, go back to the pit!
    You know, if Terri does die, and that is IF because I don't think the fights over, God will still have the victory. Terri will be with Him for eternity..oh death, where is thy sting? Thank You Jesus for what You did on the cross for all of us.
    Marine Momma

    By Anonymous Marine Momma, at 12:05 AM  

  • Yeah, FloridaHeat, I'm surprised you made that claim, too. The Schindlers agreed with the PVS asseessment until their falling out with Michael (after the malpractice settlement).

    12:01 AM


    It's because on this blog and all the other Save Terri blogs they make shit up right and left .. whatever they want to ... and they believe if they SAY it enough ... that it becomes FACT.

    It's insanity!!!!

    NO ONE HERE wants to face the truth or the facts.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:06 AM  

  • IF HE DIDN'T CARE ABOUT HER .. he would have divorced her a long time ago ... and let the Schindlers do whatever they wanted with her.

    Nope, wrong analogy. If scumbag adulterer husband did care, then he would let her parents have her and quietly move away. Scumbag adulterer is trying to make sure Terri never speaks well enough to say what really happened to her that day.
    Marine Momma

    By Anonymous Marine Momma, at 12:09 AM  

  • uh=oh, satans little minions are back, the Lord rebuke you, go back to the pit!
    You know, if Terri does die, and that is IF because I don't think the fights over, God will still have the victory. Terri will be with Him for eternity..oh death, where is thy sting? Thank You Jesus for what You did on the cross for all of us.
    Marine Momma


    SATAN .. I REBUKE YOU ... STAND BACK SATAN .. I REBUKE YOU!!!

    Yea well .. God may have Terri but rest assured .. that's not where you'll be sitting. Hope you like it hot.

    By Anonymous Tammy Faye, at 12:10 AM  

  • Marine Momma, LOL! We will all die and rot with the worms eating us. Learn to accept that and you will find peace and freedom. But alas, you will go on believing in your fairytale "God" and live in fear all your life. Yes, FEAR. You probably know nothing apart from it.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:11 AM  

  • hey little minion, the Lord rebuke you. Jesus says in Scripture that those who call on His name, believe in Him shall be saved. I am saved and heaven bound, in fact I'll wave to you on judgement day when you're thrown into the lake of fire.
    Marine Momma

    By Anonymous Marine Momma, at 12:12 AM  

  • find peace and freedom. But alas, you will go on believing in your fairytale "God" and live in fear all your life. Yes, FEAR. You probably know nothing apart from it.
    fear? not at all...total peace. you're the one reacting with fear and it shows. you know you're losing and you know what's coming.
    Marine Momma

    By Anonymous Marine Momma, at 12:14 AM  

  • Marine Momma, I rebuke you in the name of Christ. LOL!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:15 AM  

  • Nope, wrong analogy. If scumbag adulterer husband did care, then he would let her parents have her and quietly move away. Scumbag adulterer is trying to make sure Terri never speaks well enough to say what really happened to her that day.

    Scumbag Marine Momma:

    What color is the sky in your world?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:17 AM  

  • Anon I have not seen everything on here but the last few weeks i can say the site is not makeing up lies, just trying to keep people informed. the people leaving comments are the ones doing more lying or i should say not doing good research. the blog may be a little over the edge for sure but trying to keep people informed.

    By Anonymous ylb, at 12:18 AM  

  • Scumbag adulterer is trying to make sure Terri never speaks well enough to say what really happened to her that day.

    That doesn't square with the fact (yes, it is a fact) that Michael put Terri through aggressive rehabilitation efforts, including that experimental thalamus implant.

    If Michael truly was worried about something Terri would say, he wouldn't have done that for the first three years

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:19 AM  

  • 20+ years of my life were spent as a devout member and born-again Christian in a PAOC church... left the fold in around 2000 and haven't looked back. Ahhh.. sweet freedom (from the crushing "freedom" of Christianity).

    /let terri die with dignity

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:22 AM  

  • oh .. Scumbaq Marine Momma:

    How dare you .... because this is what YOU are going to hear on that Judgment Day ... loud and clear:

    Matthew 7:15 -24

    15“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?

    17Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.

    21“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ 23Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’

    Your fruit is rotten to the core and you are one of the poorest examples of a Christian that I have ever seen ... you hate filled woman.

    He will say to you ... "I never knew you."

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:23 AM  

  • If you want to post here and attack me-- this is fine'But I will delete comments with namecalling....

    If you want to have your voice heard- then follow the rules...

    By Blogger Straight Up with Sherri, at 12:24 AM  

  • ylb said...

    Anon I have not seen everything on here but the last few weeks i can say the site is not makeing up lies.


    The fact that they are calling Michael Schiavo a MURDERER is not a lie?

    The fact that they are calling Judge Greer a thief and a murderer is not a lie?

    Check YOUR facts.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:26 AM  

  • Straight Up with Sherri said...

    If you want to post here and attack me-- this is fine'But I will delete comments with namecalling....

    If you want to have your voice heard- then follow the rules...


    Then you better start by deleting comments posted by Marine Mommal. Because I KNOW you'd want to be fair about this, right?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:28 AM  

  • yes I do want to be fair..

    that is why I gave a warning and did not just start deleting...

    By Blogger Straight Up with Sherri, at 12:29 AM  

  • Read on back I have said that calling these people murderers is so unfair its not even funny. Just saying most of the lies about whats going on are from posters not the articals that "sherri" posts. I agree that Greer is doing what the law tells him to do.

    By Anonymous ylb, at 12:31 AM  

  • Sherri-Great job... I also actually read through the entire emergency motion.In it there is an affidavit of an MD expert in strangulation and domestic violence. I blogged about it and am using your list of MSM...Thanks

    By Anonymous Crystal Clear, at 12:33 AM  

  • Sherri-Great job... I also actually read through the entire emergency motion.In it there is an affidavit of an MD expert in strangulation and domestic violence. I blogged about it and am using your list of MSM...Thanks

    By Anonymous Crystal Clear, at 12:33 AM  

  • I'm not sure Terri said something last week to this woman, but I am sure she has responded over the years to her family. Why is it that Schivo wants her dead so badly? As sick is this is I think it is to spite her family.He has a vendeta against them. Too many people have come out to say things about him that are not nice.I think he didn't cause her injury, but he wants rid of her so he get on with his new life. He could divorce Terri, but he wants to hurt Terris parents. From what I gather he is a controlling man who wants to punish the Shindler family. He just lucked out getting willing judges in Florida.This is one of the most frustating stories I have ever witnessed.

    By Anonymous Sadie, at 12:42 AM  

  • I'm not sure Terri said something last week to this woman, but I am sure she has responded over the years to her family. Why is it that Schivo wants her dead so badly? As sick is this is I think it is to spite her family.He has a vendeta against them. Too many people have come out to say things about him that are not nice.I think he didn't cause her injury, but he wants rid of her so he get on with his new life. He could divorce Terri, but he wants to hurt Terris parents. From what I gather he is a controlling man who wants to punish the Shindler family. He just lucked out getting willing judges in Florida.This is one of the most frustating stories I have ever witnessed.

    By Anonymous Sadie, at 12:42 AM  

  • but I am sure she has responded over the years to her family

    You are sure because....?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:51 AM  

  • Why is it that Schivo wants her dead so badly? As sick is this is I think it is to spite her family.He has a vendeta against them. Too many people have come out to say things about him that are not nice.I think he didn't cause her injury, but he wants rid of her so he get on with his new life. He could divorce Terri, but he wants to hurt Terris parents. From what I gather he is a controlling man who wants to punish the Shindler family.

    Sadie .. did you read anything else in these comments post? He doesn't "want her dead so badly". He wants to follow her wishes .. the wishes she told him, her brother and siter in law ... many years ago.

    Many people have come out in the last few months .. saying things. Why didn't they say these things 15 years ago?

    Why would he want her "dead" to get on with his life? He has moved on somewhat .. he doesn't need her dead to do that. If that were the motivating factor, he could have divorced her.

    He is not trying to hurt Terri's parents. He is DOING WHAT TERRI ASKED HIM TO DO.

    You said: From what I gather he is a controlling man who wants to punish the Shindler family.

    From what you gather. Meaning from what you've read ... on sensationalist websites/logs. There is no evidence of such, there was no evidence of this in the original trial .. and this didn't come up until he attempted to follow her wishes the first time.

    Investigate the facts. Read them.

    http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/WolfsonReport.pdf

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:54 AM  

  • Anon. I'm sure because I have researched and read affadavits and other material available from the last 10 years regarding this case. I don't believe everything I read in the press. I actually do research. How about you?Did your info come from Cnn or abc or cbs? Or did you actually look into this story?

    By Anonymous Sadie, at 12:58 AM  

  • This gets better and better ....

    On Thursday, a Rockford, Ill., man was arrested in Seminole after trying to steal a weapon from a gun shop. Michael W. Mitchell, 20, told deputies he wanted to "take some action and rescue Terri Schiavo" after he visited the Pinellas Park hospice where she lives, an official said. Seminole is about 5 miles west of Pinellas Park.

    Also, the FBI (news - web sites) said a man was arrested Friday in Fairview, N.C., on charges of sending an e-mail threat, allegedly for offering a $250,000 bounty for Michael Schiavo's death and $50,000 for that of a judge in the case. The FBI did not immediately identify the judge.


    And if someone gets hurt by these vigilanties ... is that blood on the right-wingers hands?

    It's Over

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:01 AM  

  • How about testimony from the female police officer as well? I think that if these people are lying as the "let Terri die" crowd are suggesting than it's one Hell of a bold lie including a police officer in the lie.

    Even Michael Schiavo admitted on Larry King Alive that he "didn't know what Terri wanted, but this is what WE want." But because Larry King is the worst interviewer on earth, he let it go by without even saying, "ah, dude, that's not what you've been telling the court for, like a decade."

    Even Michael can't stand by the "this is what Terri wanted" statement. Isn't that at all telling? Or are the "pro-death" forces just sticking their fingers in their ears and yelling "la la la la la, I can't hear you"?

    I'm not so arrogant as to say or imply that I know what what Terri wanted or wants, I just have looked at the case and made rather radical suggestion that, in cases of where a doubt exists, it is more prudent to err on the SIDE OF LIFE. Geez, is that such a radical suggestion? And Michael himself slipped up and admitted it isn't about what Terri said, it's about what he wants.

    Doesn't that give ANYBODY on the other side pause at all? If not, why not? And please, if you're just going to write back insults, don't bother.

    By Blogger C. Schweitzer, at 1:04 AM  

  • Marnie Mama

    Please don't speak of how you will be happy when you watch them thrown into the fire...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:07 AM  

  • There are 4min28sec worth of video on terrisfight.org. I understand that the court has 4 hours worth of video. If you do the math, 98.2% of the video has not been seen by the layperson. The Schindlers are trying to convince the public based on 1.8% of the video footage.

    That is why Greer has held (and the 2nd District Court of Appeals has also stated) that her responses there are random and reflex responses. She makes the same gestures without anyone saying anything or doing anything to her. Even the Wolfson GAL report addresses this.

    Her privacy has already been lost so I hope that the other 98.2% of the footage gets out someday so that people understand this more.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:12 AM  

  • How about testimony from the female police officer as well?

    I found that testimony curiously absent from today's filing. Have you even read the filing? No affidavit from the police officer. And certainly no testimony.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:14 AM  

  • Anon.If I were you I would want to be anoymous to. I don't make statements from what I read on Blogs, but I think the information is a lot better than the msm.I gather that is where you get your information.I actually looked into the hearings and read affadvits of witness' over the years regarding this case.When I say I gather or I think ,I'm giving my opinion of the facts as I see them,not as Sherri or anyone else sees them. I have actually read court reports ect. but I know it doesn't make me an expert. What makes you an expert Anon?

    By Anonymous Sadie, at 1:16 AM  

  • Marnie Mama

    Please don't speak of how you will be happy when you watch them thrown into the fire...


    Now you're Marnie Mama?

    LOL

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:19 AM  

  • Ah, nice way to cherry-pick from my post and not deal with the real crux of it.

    That's why Judge Greer should hold a hearing--to ask two important questions: what did the police officer hear (if anything) AND what did Michael Schiavo mean when he went on Larry King Dead and said "I don't know what Terri wanted, BUT this is what WE WANT."

    By Blogger C. Schweitzer, at 1:19 AM  

  • I hope Anon and sadie don't get into a pi$$ing match. This isn't about you, guys.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:19 AM  

  • There are 4min28sec worth of video on terrisfight.org. I understand that the court has 4 hours worth of video. If you do the math, 98.2% of the video has not been seen by the layperson. The Schindlers are trying to convince the public based on 1.8% of the video footage.

    There is about 4.5 hours of video.

    The picked out and edited together the 4 min and 28 seconds. The don't want anyone to see the rest.

    Sadly, I don't think they are trying to convince the public .. I think they are trying to convince themselves. They just cannot face reality ...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:21 AM  

  • Cherry picking?

    Did you read the affidavit?

    Both the sister and Weller said Terri uttered something so loud that those outside could hear. Neither of them stipulated that those outside did hear it.

    Think about it. Wouldn't that sort of affidavit helped them out a LOT today? Something from the sister's husband or the police officer confirming they heard it?

    Why did the aunt who was in the room not submit an affidavit?

    Talk about cherry picking!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:22 AM  

  • non.If I were you I would want to be anoymous to. I don't make statements from what I read on Blogs

    Well, that's not true because you believe what you read on this blog.

    However, why don't you try clicking that LINK and read the report of the GAL who was Court appointed to give a report to Jeb Bush in 2003.

    Here honey, I'll post it again for you.

    http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/WolfsonReport.pdf

    Then while you're over there, why don't you read the Schiavo info page .. that has a complete time line and break down of all the evidence presented .. and links to most of it.

    Oh .. by the way .. the "blog" is the writings of an 11th Circuit Appellate Attorney ....

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:26 AM  

  • Talk about cherry picking. All you Anons are desperately trying to find some reason to end the life of Terri. Guilty are you? If you had done any research at all you would not be so quick to want her death.There are too many questions regarding the circumstances surrounding Terri to be so quick to end her life. Her family wants nothing more than to take her home and take care of her.How does that hurt Michael Schivo?From the evidence I have seen it looks like he wants to punish this family.He has no interest in her,.He has a "wife" and two children.What are his motives?

    By Anonymous Sadie, at 1:31 AM  

  • Both the sister and Weller said Terri uttered something so loud that those outside could hear Neither of them stipulated that those outside did hear it.

    It's not like they could have been in collusion on this "report" ... could they? *pondering*

    (Weller: Psst .. Susan ... did you hear her groan? I think that moan sounded like she said, "I want to live!" Did you hear it??

    Susan: Hmmm .. I thought it was a grunt but maybe you're right ... I think she said, "I want to live!!" Let's use that in one of the appeals when the first 4 are turned down"

    Weller: OK, that's a great idea to throw in at the last minute when we've exhausted all other possibilities!"

    Susan: Right on! I'll tell Mom and Dad Aunt Mae, did you hear her say anything?

    Aunt Mae: No, darling, I didn't.

    Weller: That's okay, Aunt Mae, we know you're a little hard of hearing. Weller to Susan: *wink wink*)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:33 AM  

  • SADIE!!!

    I've posted it twice .. GO READ IT and then get back to me, okay?

    http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/WolfsonReport.pdf

    http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html

    GO READ IT

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:36 AM  

  • And by the way Anon that "GAL" Wolfeson is a man

    By Anonymous Sadie, at 1:37 AM  

  • sadie: And by the way Anon that "GAL" Wolfeson is a man

    You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME?!? You've done all this independent research, huh?

    LOL

    GAL = Guardian ad litem (that's the role Wolfson filled).

    Great research.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:43 AM  

  • I don't know whether I believe the report of last Friday's incident with Terri or not, but I asked specifically what say you "let Terri die" folks in the wake of Michael Schiavo's own statement on Larry King that he "DOESN'T KNOW WHAT TERRI WANTS, BUT THIS IS WHAT *WE* WANT."

    Can't you, even given that bombshell, now allow that, hey, Terri might NOT want to starve to death after all? You're more comfortable engaging in a shouting match and trading insults than dealing with the central (and ONLY) issue in this case: the legal requirement for "CLEAR AND CONVINCING PROOF" that Terri wanted to die by starvation.

    Michael testified that HE KNEW Terri wanted this and now he admits he doesn't KNOW.

    So, what logical (non-hateful, non-demogogic) response do you have to that? Are you capable of one? I am capable of admitting she MIGHT want to die. I don't know for sure. Are you capable of admitting that she MIGHT NOT want to die? Or can't you do that because when I admit doubt, she lives but if you were to admit doubt, she also lives--and that's not a result that you'll EVER concede.

    That's the worst kind of intellectual dishonesty.

    By Blogger C. Schweitzer, at 1:46 AM  

  • Sadie:

    You have just lost any crediblity with me. If you had done all this research and reading of court documents and affidavits from the various trials and appeals, then you would know

    a) www.abstractappeal.com is not an every day weblog

    b) that GAL means Guardian Ad Litem, not woman

    Please be quiet now.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:47 AM  

  • Regarding the Larry King Live transcript, this post easily satisfies me.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:52 AM  

  • Are you capable of admitting that she MIGHT NOT want to die?

    Nope, I am not.

    Because I do not believe that anyone having a choice would want to live the way she's lived the last 15 years.

    She doesn't even know or realize that she's been locked in a prison. A lifeless grey world. She cannot eat, she cannot swallow. She cannot talk. She cannot move. She cannot think. Cerebral Spinal Fluid fills the cavity where her brain once lived. So honestly .. NO I do not believe she'd want to live, nor anyone else in that position.

    It is not living. It is not life. Terri is not in there. That is just a shell. And it's incredibly tragic.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:53 AM  

  • Well, thank you for your response. I know now that I was completely wrong to think you would be a reasonable person and my words are wasted.

    Move along, no intellect to be detected there. The anonymous subject has no detectable brain activity.

    By Blogger C. Schweitzer, at 1:59 AM  

  • Anon.My mistake about GAL. I thought you were being sarcastic. Did you see Wolfeson on Hannity and Colmes Mar. 23? He was doing some real backpeddling there.I'm aware of abstractappeal, as I read it at LGF where I am registered. I tend to read more than one source and then make my own conclusions. And by the way I don't care if you have any respect for me,as I have none for you. On LGF you would be considered a Troll.This isn't about us its' about Terri who is dying while we argue.How does that make you feel?

    By Anonymous Sadie, at 2:05 AM  

  • There are at least 2 (probably 3) anon posters right now.

    C. Schweitzer said: Or can't you do that because when I admit doubt, she lives but if you were to admit doubt, she also lives--and that's not a result that you'll EVER concede.

    IMHO, that question demonstrates a very keen intellect, at least when it comes to public debate and/or human behavior. But it does border on over-analysis and a way do debunk the opposing view without really trying to listen to it. Not that you care about my humble opinion!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:05 AM  

  • To whichever one of the "anonymouses" (is that word ever meant to be plural?) addressed me, of course I am interested in all reasonable opinions. The very fact that I'm here at 1:26 am on a Friday night typing away suggests that I care perhaps a little too much for my own good.

    Far from trying to overanalyze things, I'm trying desperately to get things down to their simplest forms: doubt = err on side of life, and not get bogged down in medical arguments or the role of the judiciary or the importance of federalism or even interfamily dynamics.

    By Blogger C. Schweitzer, at 2:26 AM  

  • Sun Hudson.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:32 AM  

  • So why didn't any of you people give a damn when they pulled the plug on Sun Hudson?

    All your little candlelight vigils, reenactments of the crucifiction of Christ, spammings, petitioning, and other such things will do NOTHING. The law is clear on this. Numerous judges have already demonstrated this.

    Terri Schiavo is nolonger there. Her body is nothing but a zombie with a pulse. She hasn't been there for 15 years. Do you know what her horrific plea for life was? It was this: "Aaaaaaaaaaaawaaaaaaaaaa"

    Which would've probably been accompanied by drool, but she probably can't drool anymore. Let her body die in peace! You're not doing ANYONE a favor.

    By Anonymous LincolnLogolas, at 6:20 AM  

  • I've been emailing everyone I know(including in the U.K.) to forward the message to BOYCOTT FLORIDA TOURISM and PRODUCTS, effective immediately. This is an inhumane and despicable state. Cancel all travel plans to Florida NOW!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:59 PM  

  • People, she IS DEAD! She is completely missing her cerebral cortex! It's just liquid in her brain. She DIED 15 years ago!!! Doctors, and the husband, were sure of this 10 years ago already. The parents are just very selfish and want to keep their "daughter" around to pretend she is still with them. They cannot let go because they cannot handle death. Their daughter died 15 years ago, but nobody sees that! What is wrong with people? This makes me sad for the intelligence of humanity. Here are the only things that need to happen in this case:

    1. Let Terri die
    2. Parents need LOTS of counselling!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:59 PM  

  • Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a Free site Free Article Search. It pretty much covers political article related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:34 AM  

  • Hey, nice blog and great info!
    Woah! I never thought I would finally come across professional article on eating disorder
    site, I've been searching for this high and low.
    Come and check it out if you get time I would really appreciate it :-)

    By Blogger Computer Anti Virus, at 4:15 PM  

  • What's that saying about round up all the lawyers... LOL! Here's your chance... florida accident lawyer

    By Blogger Just Surfing, at 1:47 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home