Straight Up with Sherri

Friday, June 10, 2005

The Democrat Party And The Culture Of Death

As a prelude to this editorial, let me categorically declare that I recognize that not all Democrats embrace the Culture of Death. In a similar fashion, I know that all Republicans do not embrace the Culture of Life.

I was reading an op-ed piece by Evan Sayet published by, entitled Republican Party the Pro-choice Party. The essence of his opinion is that the Democrats are really not pro-choice as they claim to be, but rather pro-abortion. He further goes on to explain this position: that the Democrat Party conspires to prevent any choice from being allowed to women; that any measures designed to provide information or assistance in "choice" are systematically destroyed.

Then Mr. Sayet does something even more spectacular. He explains why! In an effort to hold on to any vestige of power, the Democrat Party has aligned itself with two adamantly Pro-abortion groups:

Most prominent among these groups is the radical feminist movement, which sees its argument that there is no difference between a man and a woman except what society has thrust upon them exposed as pure folly each time a pregnant woman walks down the street.

Similarly the radical homosexual movement, which seeks to sell the concept that there is no difference between homosexuality and heterosexuality, sees the product of the union of man and woman – something they cannot create themselves – as overwhelming evidence that their claims are patently ludicrous.

This is a highly charged essay that is certainly worth reading in its entirety.

Right Wing Nut Job


  • First of all, the quote about what the Democratic party stands for utilizes an old debating trick of misstating your opponent's position so that your position seems all the more reasonable. I would think that this tactic would be rejected by people who claim to love the truth. What the writer you quoted claims the Dems believe is not what the Dems believe; and I would challenge you to find any documentation BY DEMOCRATS to support the writer's absurd claims.
    But that's not why I came over here. I thought I'd let you know that Kerry has released his complete military record, ( so you can take your header off your site (again, if you have any interest in being truthful-- but, then, that's really up to you). Please feel free to post something snide about how long it took, and then I'll be waiting to hear you say something equally snide about the fact that Dubya has yet to explain his lost year in his cushy stateside assignment--you know, the one his daddy got him while Kerry was getting shot at in Vietnam.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:39 AM  

  • Nice post put hate to tell you that if you think they give a rats ass here about truth you are wrong. They dont care about truth at all just what they think.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:44 AM  

  • Anonymous,
    We will know the intentions of the Democrat party by their actions. We don't need further documentation - they have already supplied the truth.

    According to the truth, John Kerry has not released his records via SF-180 as he promised to do. If you read the Boston Globe article that you have submitted as evidence of your contention, you will find that it does not claim that the form was submitted to the Department of the Navy (it wasn't!). He merely authorized selective information to be released to one group, his pander-goon propaganda machine at the Boston Globe. We're still waiting! The post remains. This is not snide, it is reality.

    Dubya has signed SF-180. All of his information is public and available to you to do with as you please. All of your apparent hate for GWB does not change these realities one bit.

    By Blogger Right Wing Nut Job, at 1:25 PM  

  • why does anyone even give a shit about it?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:36 PM  

  • Anonymous:
    why does anyone even give a shit about it?

    Apparently you do, or you wouldn't bother to comment on it.

    By Blogger Right Wing Nut Job, at 1:52 PM  

  • It seems sherry has wised up and left. good for her mabey she woke up!!!!!!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:48 PM  

  • Anonys are like rectums everybody has one. Kerry has yet to come clean and that much is apparent. The democrats need to be exposed as the rank hypocrits that they are. When the majority of vets you were with would not vote for you what does that tell you?

    By Blogger Alnot, at 10:50 AM  

  • All politicians are hypocrits.
    Not to mention I don't give a rats ass about what anyone did 30 years ago. I for one would not even blame anyone for dodgeing the draft. Who is the Government to tell me I need to go defend another contry?

    as far as you first little snide.
    does this make me less of an Annon?

    By Blogger AlnotisADip, at 11:16 AM  

  • Thats what I thought Alnot!!! you see now how you are just as anon as anyone else. You sure are a sharp cookie!!!

    By Blogger AlnotisADip, at 12:18 AM  

  • I am the author of the Republicans are the Party of Choice article and I was checking out some of the comments here. Typically those in defense of the pro-death Democratic Party positions offer attacks but no facts to back them up.

    If intentionally hiding information from girls and women is NOT the goal of the Democratic Party then what IS their agenda in denying women and girls the full information about the horrors of abortions? Why do they not only "sell" the idea of abortions as fast, free, painless and without side-effects but then sell T-shirts that proudly proclaim "I Had An Abortion?"

    As for "all politicians" being hypocrites this is a rather simplistic way of relieving oneself of the burdern of having to think. There are degrees of wrongs including hypocracy and lies. While I don't subscribe to the notion that ALL politiicans are hypocrites or liars even if I did I would prefer one who, say, lies about something small and meaningless to ones who lie about, say, the holocaust.

    Finally, no one would care about what John Kerry did thirty years ago with regard to his military experience except that it was John Kerry who cynically tried to make his four months in Vietnam the very centerpiece of his campaign. Obviously we didn't care about Clinton's military record because he didn't trot out a handful of veterans, salute, say "reporting for duty" and then slander the military records of others.

    Evan Sayet

    By Anonymous Evan Sayet, at 10:40 AM  

  • Terri report is out hubby and drs. were right no way of recovery ohh and she was blind too. kinda shoots down they whole "she would smile when he mom walked in" theory. WTG suckers

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:22 PM  

  • ``People should understand that sometimes, for known or unknown reasons, individuals sustain massive brain injury that for which healing is not possible,'' said Dr. Karen Weidenheim, the chief of neuropathology at Montefiore Medical Center in New York. ``Everything that could have been done was done for this lady for 15 years, and this case is very tragic.''

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:49 PM  

  • Everything that could have been done was done for this lady for 15 years, and this case is very tragic.''

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:49 PM  

  • Claim what you want about Dubya. It's a statement about a person's relationship with reality when he criticizes the record of a veteran who actually took fire and defends the record of a veteran who hid safely stateside. Whatever Dubya did or didn't release, there is no record related to over a year of his "service." There are credible claims about his file having been scrubbed. It's easy to release a record that you've already had edited. On top of that, he refuses to answer questions about that period of time. So whatever piece of paper he has released is irrelevant to the questions that he still hasn't answered about what he was up to for that missing year.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:46 AM  

  • Ridiculous trolls.

    If you would bother to read the Terri Schiavo Autopsy Report, instead of just making fun of her for being blind (gee, maybe she recognized her mother's VOICE, did you think of that?!), you will find that contrary to the extremely biased stories in the media, the autopsy was largely inconclusive.

    The autopsy makes no conclusion about how Terri collapsed in the first place, and it does NOT rule out strangulation. It DOES seem to rule out that she had a heart attack from an eating disorder, as the anti-Terri squad often mocked before her death, implying that she deserved to die because she was bulimic.

    The autopsy report also states that while nothing about her brain was inconsistent with a diagnosis of PVS, such a diagnosis can only be made on a living patient. Thus we still don't know if Terri really was in a Persistent Vegetative State, and now we never will, since kill-happy yahoos said that Terri should die before we got all of the answers. Congress and the President said, wait, we should get all of the facts before we kill her, but the pro-death crazies who call themselves "reality based" didn't want facts; they just wanted Terri dead.

    As for the other issue, you do realize that President Bush NEVER criticized Senator Kerry's war record, and that he in fact said that Senator Kerry was more courageous that he was? Yet the mindlessly anti-GWB crowd blames Bush for the actions of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth since GWB refused to take away their First Amendment right to free speech. How stupid.

    As for the original POINT of this post, do you deny that most high-ranking Democrats support the "right to choose" abortion? Do you deny that most high-ranking Democrats support the "right to die"? Do you deny that more Democrats than Republicans support "gay rights"?

    Here is an interesting speech from Senator Kerry with his feelings on abortion:

    Senator Kerry's speech while at a NARAL dinner

    By Anonymous JWL, at 12:56 PM  

  • If you would bother to read the Terri Schiavo Autopsy Report, instead of just making fun of her for being blind (gee, maybe she recognized her mother's VOICE, did you think of that?!

    NO NO NO It was said that shr "made eye contact" and "smiled when her mother walked in the room" not when she spoke.

    The autopsy report also states that while nothing about her brain was inconsistent with a diagnosis of PVS, such a diagnosis can only be made on a living patient.

    IT WAS many times over when she was alive.
    P.S. I do feel bad for her and her husband and family but I just wish the world would have let this private matter be just that PRIVATE. those involved had 15 years of it you jokers made up your minds about the whole thing in 15 minutes. that is sad!!!!!!!!!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:04 PM  

  • It's been my observation that politicians use emotional issues to leverage advantage for their Party. ( or selves ) Typically these emotional issues do not really belong in the realm of government. Somehow the tax money issues causes the crack and the PC's flood in.
    No not all poloticains are hypocrits, but enough of them are and get in the way of real progress for the people of the Country.
    It matters not, really, which party we speak of - they all do what ever they think will advance the "Party". Rarely does that translate into "for the good of the peolpe".
    My self, I would like to see us vote on Americans working for us Americans, rather than a Political Party. The day of the Political Party may be coming to an end! I hope!


    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:01 PM  

  • I never claimed Dubya criticized Kerry. (He had his minions do his dirty work; but that's beside the point.) In this particular instance I was talking about you folks.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:47 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home